Latest Posts

Gripen vs f15

In an interview with Defense NewsCapt. McGehee explained that like its fifth-generation brother, the F Raptor, the F is very difficult to detect at long distances thanks to its stealthiness. But in close combat, an F will engage an F and F very differentlyhe said. He declined to discuss specifics that could reveal tactics, techniques and procedures and provide an adversary with hints about how to best either aircraft.

According Capt. Ryan Fantasia, an FA pilot with the 34th FS, in the skies above Kadena, F pilots are focusing primarily on the air-to-air fight — a rarity for the F, a stealthy fifth-generation jet that is more known for its air-to-ground capability. In in fact an F beat an F in a dogfight.

At the time, the Defense Department claimed that the F involved in the mock dogfight was a very early model with a flight envelope limited to only 5. Furthermore the jet also did not have many of the mission systems, stealth coating or helmet display functionality which are now widely available. In February, the Fs at Kadena got the latest block 3F softwarethe full combat capability version that allows the aircraft to fly its entire flight envelope and up to 9 G maneuvers.

Photo credit: U. Dario Leone is an aviation, defense and military writer.

How to store string in c

His writing has appeared in The National Interest and other news media. You must be logged in to post a comment.

Here's when an F-15 is better than an F-22 or an F-35

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Japan would like to export F-X fighter to Intruders over Libya: former A-6 crew members remember CHK King Stallion demonstrates long-range logistic support capabilities Correcting the Record on first confirmed MiG-killing Phantom Impressive video Shows Avro Shackleton tearing down a From Skyhawk to Hornet: video features Interview with Military Aviation.

So can the F beat the F in dogfights? This print is available in multiple sizes from AircraftProfilePrints. Dario Leone Dario Leone is an aviation, defense and military writer. You may also like.

F-15 Vs Su-35: A BRIEF COMPARISON BETWEEN THE MIGHTY EAGLE AND THE LATEST FLANKER VARIANT

Apr 15 Apr 14 Apr 13 Apr 12 Remote Vision System 2. Apr 11 Leave a Comment Cancel Reply You must be logged in to post a comment. Welcome to The Aviation Geek Club, your new stopover aviation place. Launched in by Dario Leone, an Italian lifelong - aviation geek, this blog is the right place where you can share your passion and meet other aviation enthusiasts from all over the world.

Custom rom for redmi 4x

All rights reserved.Again nicely done! I would not mine a mixed fleet of both these aircraft, but I think it would be more likely to see 50 Super Hornets and 18 F's on the flight line. Now that being said having Boeing and Saab work together does put a wrench in things specially if a Canadian company or companies joins the party.

The other item is the cost of taking our pilot from one type of Hornet to another. In the 80 's Canada wanted the land version of the Hornet bigger and the had to go with the navy version, well the Super Hornet is the land version. Maybe that's the origin of your confusion. If all that Canada need is the best fighter, well, just buy 54 Eurofighters.

In your evaluation you don't include the beneffit of two engines over the artic, and the beneffit of a big airplane when loaded with bombs and missiles for a multirrol mission.

The Meteor is a great missile, but not a silver bullet. The Aim D can reach KM! So is it a fighter you need to combat or is a bombing mission you want? Gripen clear winner in the air doesn't it says it all. Good job Doug. This "fight" shows us clearly that the difference stays in the primary use by the air force : -A little "do it all" Gripenwith a very good "punch for the buck ratio" and with a very efficient EWSbut lacking range and depending on to many suppliers.

Perfect for a little european country who need to remplace the old F for air policy and more if need is. But the SH is built to be use in a complex air force with Growler a navy request because over the see it's impossible to following ground and evade enemys radar. SH is not the better choice for air superiority particulary against last gen. Is it not the best fighter for Canada like taking out flying objects which is hard to do with ground ordnance.

Isn't it a bit strange that cannot the Hornet-family do something today it is a piece of a cake to add whatever extra functionality but only for the Hornets. As Canada is not allowed to do anything by themself it is not that sure it will happen, not when or what it will cost if it happens.Return to Modern Military Aircraft.

Welcome, anonymous guest! Author Message. At least in the west the F remained to be the best fighter. The aircraft achieved an impressive combat record and proved itself effective in the AA and AG roles. More than F were built to date and customized versions of the latest variant are still in production to fulfill the orders of international customers. Until the late 90s exported Eagles were inferior or equal at best to their US counterparts, this has changed as an increasing number of aircraft manufacturers from around the world is fighting hard for order from the international market.

Here's when an F-15 is better than an F-22 or an F-35

Various manufacturers offer their best products and force Boeing to offer singificantly more advanced versions of the F The latest export models are even more capable than the examples used by the USAF.

The F is over 30 years old now, but Boeing continously upgraded the aircraft to keep it up to date and ensure that it remains operationally relevant. The F is still a capable, but the upper limit of its growth potential is nearly reached and except for Japan there are nearly no chances to sell the Eagle anywhere. Its days as the worlds best fighter are counted. But it's not just the Raptor which surpasses the F The Eurofighter Typhoon, next generation multirole fighter jointly developed Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom is rated among the best fighters in the world and is classed as number 2 in the AA area by some experts.

The Typhoon had a hard time surviving the end of the cold war and is criticised for its costs and long development. Meanwhile the Typhoon has entered service with all 4 customer nations and the first export customer as well. Deliveries startetd in and first squadrons were equipped since The Typhoon is the current next generation fighter with the largest order book for some agreed aircraft, plus 97 aircraft for the secured export customers Austria and Saudi Arabia. The comparison Though there are basically 5 variants of the F, the relevant differentiation between them is the single seat fighter FC and the twin seat multirole fighter FE with its versions.

A comparison of the FEs and Typhoon block 5s AG capability doesn't make much sense, as the Typhoon block 5 have only an initial and very limited AG capability. The FE basically owns advantages in terms of payload and range and being a twin seat. But with the right weapons the Typhoon is likely to enjoy some advantages in terms of survivability thanks to lower signatures, a more sophisticated and comprehensive EWS and probably superior performance at the expense of payload and range.

More interesting is the comparison in the AA area as this is the task for which both aircraft were designed.

Kadena’s F-15 driver says the Eagle can beat the F-35A in dogfights

Comparing the FC to the current Typhoon block 5 shows a noticeable superiority for the Typhoon in most areas and therefore a superior overall performance in the AA area. Typhoon's lower visual signature and vastly superior agility, in combination with more advanced and effective flying suits for crew protection make the aircraft a superior dogfighter.An F, left, alongside an F US Air Force In a recent interview with Business Insider, Justin Bronka research fellow specializing in combat airpower at the Royal United Services Instituterevealed why the F, originally introduced four decades ago, is still more useful than either the F or the F in certain situations.

The F is a traditional air-superiority fighter of the fourth generation.

World war z save wizard codes

It's big, fast, agile, and carriers lots of weapons under the wing where everyone can see them. For that last reason, it's terrible at stealth, but the other side of the coin is that it's perfect for intercepting enemy aircraft. The major advantage of fifth-generation aircraft is their stealth abilities and situational awareness.

C-27, Gripen & F-15 Over Baltics

Even the best aircraft in the world would be lucky to lay eyes on any fifth-generation fighter, which means they can set up and control the engagement entirely on their terms.

But while this paradigm lends itself ideally to fighting and killing, interception is a different beast. The advantages of the F, and particularly of the F, diminish greatly once planes get within visual range of one another. Also, fifth-gens usually carry their munitions inside internal bomb bays, which is great for stealth but doesn't really strike the same note that staring down an AIM-9 Sidewinder missile on the side of an F would. Simply put, a fifth-gen revealing itself to a legacy fighter would be akin to a hunter laying down his gun before confronting a wild beast.

McDonnell Douglas, St. Furthermore, interception happens way more frequently than air-to-air combat. Interceptions happen all the timewith the Baltics and the South China Sea being particular hot spots. The fifth-gens, however, make sense for entering contested airspace. If the US wanted to enter North Korean or Iranian airspace, it wouldn't just be to show off, and according to Bronk, the aircraft's stealth and situational awareness would afford them the opportunity to slip in, hit their marks, and slip out undetected, unlike an F Fs are incredible aircraft, but within visual range confrontations are not their fight.

In interception situations, it makes no sense to offer up an F or an F as a handicapped target to an older legacy plane. Fs are more than capable of delivering the message themselves, and whoever they intercept will know that the full force of the US Air Force, including fifth-gens, stands behind them.

Account icon An icon in the shape of a person's head and shoulders. It often indicates a user profile. Login Subscribe. My Account. World globe An icon of the world globe, indicating different international options. Alex Lockie. F Lightning II FNicely done. As far as numbers of aircraft, Canada does not have enough pilots anyway.

We are recruiting from other nations, like the UK. Now in an air to air exercise the F lost to the SU could be internet propaganda? Great comparison! The FSE has some important theoretical advantages, but they come with a big price tag.

No plane is undefeatable. Every plane has strengths and weaknesses. Every Pilot has strength and weaknesses. It is a crap shoot, but you are right. No way the F15 would beat the Gripen E in a dogfight! No way. The Gripen will turn inside the Eagle every time.

The Eagle will bleed energy quicker and will not be as good in the slow regime. I don't know about the Eagles nose pointing ability but the Gripen managed degrees angle of attack during trials. My bets would be that the Gripen has a better nose pointing ability than the F The Eagle really doesn't have that much more power than the Gripen E either. Their thrust to weight isn't far apart but the Gripen will have more power due to more modern aerodynamics.

The Gripen is a smaller and much lighter aircraft and is therefore much nimbler with higher agility.

P.1.2

The old F5 was often successful against the F15 in dogfights. Also, "loose sight loose the fight" ever heard of that? The Gripen is small and difficult to see. I don't buy your "gatling gun with more rounds" argument either. To be able to react to split second opportunities is more importan and also to have as little lag as possible from the gun.

The Mauser BK27 is one of the best out there and also used by the Typhoon which would also whip the F15 in a dogfight. Also, 27mm vs 20mm is an important difference. The Gripen simply has higher firepower and when its lag-free gun hits it hits much harder.

I would rate the F5 higher than the F15 in that area. Certainly the F16 too.Posted by picard on January 11, This article will compare Western fighters that have entered service in late s or later, and are still in service. Thus list of fighter aircraft to be compared is:.

Additional requirement are low operating costs and good reliability, allowing extensive pilot training — this is possibly the most important point, since pilot skill dominates all others. Surprise lets pilot to destroy the enemy aircraft at little risk to himself, and is number one factor in gaining kills, especially at beyond visual range as BVR missiles are comparatively easily defeated. To surprise the enemy, fighter aircraft has to detect and identify hostile aircraft more quickly and consistently than the enemy, as well as be hard to detect itself.

Consequently, it must be capable of finding and attacking the enemy without use of active sensors — onboard or offboard — in order to achieve surprise, and minimum or no usage of uplinks.

Bethel church bill johnson

Avoiding the surprise is important to prevent the enemy from surprising oneself. Engine smoke can increase detection distance by a factor of 3 to 5 if engine is smoking heavily. If enemy aircraft do not smoke, then it also solves IFF problem.

In the absence of smoke, visual size and camouflage govern the detection distance; however, most modern fighters have similar gray camouflage so it will be ignored. Electronic invisibility is governed by wether radar and other sources of electronic transmissions are on or off.

Radar is the most powerful and easily detected of these sources. It also gives enemy a missile launch warning, since lock-on means that missile launch is imminent.

It can also be used for IFF as all US fighter radars operate at frequencies between 8 and 12 GHz in order to gain an all-weather capability, which means that enemy can either not use radar at all or operate outside these frequencies to solve the IFF problem. RCS reduction is a useful defense against X-band ground-based search and engagement radars, but not so against VHF ground radars and enemy fighters. Infrared invisibility also depends on several factors. Afterburner plume however means a massive increase in IR signature, especially from the rear, which means that a supercruising fighter may have advantage even if other factors are against it.

Next factor is size of the aircraft itself — larger aircraft means more drag and larger surface area to heat up; since IR sensors have resolution limits, larger size means that aircraft will be detected sooner. Lastly, there are various measures that can be taken to cool down either engine exhaust or airframe. This is best achieved by cruising faster than the enemy; since afterburner uses up too much fuel.

gripen vs f15

For this reason, maximum speed values are near-irrelevant when compared to cruise speed values. To avoid surprise, same characteristics are required. Outnumbering the enemy in the air is dependant on a number of aircraft bought for the price and b number of sorties flown per aircraft per day. In fact, even Manfred vs Richtofen had stated that most important things were pilot skills and numbers.

If the enemy is not shot down unaware, maneuvering combat will ensue in which enemies will try to get in the best position for the kill; this is equally true in beyond visual range and within visual range combat.

In beyond visual range combat, sustained turn rate gains importance as both opponents have more time to react, and energy is typically held up to make missile evasion easier. Maximum acceleration capability can be compared by comparing maximum climb rates. Maximum turn rate depends on lift coefficient and wing loading. As lift coefficient can only be determined experimentally, comparision here will be based on the wing loading.As we have already explained for more than 40 years the FC Eagle has defended the skies with a track record of success unlike any other fighter jet in the history of aviation.

A claim confirmed by the fact that the Eagle has an unmatched air-to-air kill ratio of to 0. Thanks to its updated weapon systems the mighty F will likely serve for decades to come, but does the venerable Eagle still have what it takes to dominate the skies? The only operational aircraft that is definitively superior to the F in most respects is the Lockheed Martin F Raptor—other machines have the edge in certain aspects, but the FC is still competitive overall despite what the business development departments at various rival contractors might say.

While there are more advanced threats in development, those aircraft are likely to be too expensive to ever become commonplace. The Su matches or even exceeds the capabilities of the latest upgrades for the F In fact even if the Flanker-E is slightly slower than the FC in terms of max speed, it can out accelerate the Eagle with its powerful twin Saturn Izdeliye S engines, which put out 31,lbs of thrust each.

Moreover the Su can maintain supersonic speeds without the use of its afterburners when it is lightly loaded. This print is available in multiple sizes from AircraftProfilePrints. Where the Su has an insurmountable edge is at low speeds where thanks to its three-dimensional thrust vectoring is incredibly maneuverable. At longer ranges, the FC and the FE still have the advantage over the Su with their active electronically scanned array radars.

According to The National Interest one area the Flanker-E probably holds the edge is with its electronic warfare suite. While American missiles are likely to eventually make it through, it will take many more missiles to achieve a kill than planners were counting on. The U.

gripen vs f15

The service in fact is used to fighting adversaries where it has a huge technological advantage—against the Su that deficit does not exist and the Flanker-E even has some advantages over the Eagle.

Overall, if all things were equal, even a fully upgraded FC with the latest AESA upgrades would have its hands full versus the Su But that would mean the U.

More likely to happen is that a F would run into a Su operated by some Third World despot. The pilots are not likely to have the training, tactics or experience to fight against an American aviator with a realistic chance of winning.

Further, Russian jets are not exactly known for their reliability, combine that with poorly trained maintenance crews and lack of spare parts, some random Third World power is not likely to be able generate a fully operational jet much of the time. Moreover, other than Russia and China, a potential adversary is not likely to have an AWACS or full ground controlled intercept capabilities—which further hampers the enemy.

In other words it might not be the one-sided turkey-shoot the Air Force has gotten used to, but the U. Photo credit: Tech. Dario Leone is an aviation, defense and military writer. His writing has appeared in The National Interest and other news media. You must be logged in to post a comment.

gripen vs f15

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Japan would like to export F-X fighter to Intruders over Libya: former A-6 crew members remember CHK King Stallion demonstrates long-range logistic support capabilities Correcting the Record on first confirmed MiG-killing Phantom Impressive video Shows Avro Shackleton tearing down a From Skyhawk to Hornet: video features Interview with Military Aviation.

The Su matches or even exceeds the capabilities of the latest upgrades for the F As we have already explained for more than 40 years the FC Eagle has defended the skies with a track record of success unlike any other fighter jet in the history of aviation.

Air Force. Dario Leone Dario Leone is an aviation, defense and military writer. You may also like. Apr 15


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *